Employment multipliers in categories 39 and 40
Now can you forward this email to one of your data people, because there is a weird skew that I can't understand.
I'm looking at employment multipliers in categories 39 and 40. The reason for my question is that the Pennsylvania data is so out of sync with any of the rest I've bought from you. Here's a recap.
[table]
[tr]
[td][/td][td][/td][td]Direct[/td][td]Total[/td][/tr]
[tr]
[td]NC[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]7.58[/td]
[td]13.60[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[td]40[/td]
[td]6.57[/td]
[td]12.81[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]IA[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]8.89[/td]
[td]15.13[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[td]40[/td]
[td]11.27[/td]
[td]17.84[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]TX[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]8.95[/td]
[td]16.07[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[td]40[/td]
[td]2.02[/td]
[td]9.08[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]NM[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]8.42[/td]
[td]13.54[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Mich[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]7.70[/td]
[td]14.30[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]US[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]7.63[/td]
[td]16.47[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[td]40[/td]
[td]1.82[/td]
[td]10.40[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]PA[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]3.24[/td]
[td]5.69[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[td]40[/td]
[td]0.68[/td]
[td]2.85[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
The numbers are so dramatically different than any of the other states or the US that something seems amiss. Can you help me on this? Thanks.
Was this post helpful?
-
IMPLAN SupportHello, Please see [url=http://implan.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&view=topic&catid=80&id=18893&Itemid=1679#19263]this post[/url] for our "fix ratios". You may want to consider [url=http://implan.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=545:545&catid=235:KB18]customizing the Study Area Data[/url] employment to match these. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience – please let us know if you have any additional questions or concerns.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
1 comment