We've put in some direct spending related to tourism and have some output based on this spending. My question is in relation to the initial model overview. How are the figures from the initial model overview related to the final output? How do I interpret results for "real estate" which is around $350M in the initial overview and then around $178M in my output (even though I did not put in any direct spending for real estate)? How should I interpret tax results being approximately 2x the reported actual collections in the county? Would that mean my direct spending estimates are too high? Something else? Is it even worthwhile to use the initial overview as a "check" on my direct spending? Thanks.
Was this post helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful

Comments

2 comments

  • Hi Joseph, Thank you for your post! The Model Overview screen is the economic information about the geographic region used to build your Model. It does not have any connection to what you are modeling in the software. However, the Model Overview screen can tell you if your impact results are realistic for the region though. As it would not make sense for your results to be higher than the amount that is in the geographic area. For example, the Real Estate Sector in your Model Overview is $350MM but lets just say that your Output Results was $378MM; this wouldn't make any sense. Even though you did not Directly impact the Real Estate Sector; this was an impact through the Indirect and Induced effect. You can look to see the Sectors impacted by your Direct impact: Detail Results > sort by Direct or Induced for whichever Economic Factors you want to look at it by: Employment, Labor Income, Value Added and Output. The tax results are actually a mix of state/local and at this point not able to be split. Although we are working on a way to split out the taxes; we do have a multi step process for you to split apart the state/local taxes. Please let us know if you are interested! One possibility, usually tourism studies involve a large number of retail purchases. If you used Retail Sectors, did you set the pop-up to Gross Retail Margin instead of Gross Retail Sales? Did you use a different methodology in creating your impact?
    0
  • Hi Joseph, Thank you for your post! The Model Overview screen is the economic information about the geographic region used to build your Model. It does not have any connection to what you are modeling in the software. However, the Model Overview screen can tell you if your impact results are realistic for the region though. As it would not make sense for your results to be higher than the amount that is in the geographic area. For example, the Real Estate Sector in your Model Overview is $350MM but lets just say that your Output Results was $378MM; this wouldn't make any sense. Even though you did not Directly impact the Real Estate Sector; this was an impact through the Indirect and Induced effect. You can look to see the Sectors impacted by your Direct impact: Detail Results > sort by Direct or Induced for whichever Economic Factors you want to look at it by: Employment, Labor Income, Value Added and Output. The tax results are actually a mix of state/local and at this point not able to be split. Although we are working on a way to split out the taxes; we do have a multi step process for you to split apart the state/local taxes. Please let us know if you are interested! One possibility, usually tourism studies involve a large number of retail purchases. If you used Retail Sectors, did you set the pop-up to Gross Retail Margin instead of Gross Retail Sales? Did you use a different methodology in creating your impact? Thanks!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.