Negative Direct Effect / Positive Induced Effects

I'm modeling a significant income shock in the NV statewide model that results in over $1B in household income and industry losses but also gets a result that shows a positive induced effect. I'm not entirely sure why. Here are the inputs I'm using: Brokers -3,555,790 Insurance Carriers -49,527,070 Physicians, dentists, & other health practitioners -138,779,913 Home health care services -13,849,256 Medical / diagnostic labs and outpatient and other ambulatory care services -12,461,714 Private hospitals -115,562,514 Capital -174,233,692 <10K 1044970 10K-15K 7,576,226 15K-25K 54,986,112 25K-35K 87,157,202 35K-50K 94,631,047 50K-75K -101,580,146 75K-100K -245,465,701 100K-150K -401,652,530 >150K -169,528,744
Was this post helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful

Comments

2 comments

  • Hi Alex, Thank you for your post! So that we can replicate your study, could you please let us know the exact sector numbers you used, type of activity to model the Household and Capital as well and the year of the NV total file. If you prefer, you could just send us your model! Thanks!
    0
  • i'm going to have to put my tail between my legs here and slink away...apparently i switched up the +/-up the HH income impact values by linking to the wrong table.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.