I am looking to analyze the impacts of several investment options into new power generation assets. This includes a comparison of various rate scenarios with calculated impacts on wholesale costs, generating resources costs and consumer savings/costs. I am having an issues in determining the best avenue to model the impact of these scenarios.
Initially I will run a different impact based on each scenario and rate sensitivity and compare the results to determine how they differ. My issues arises when I examine how best to input this data into the model. My input options include capital investment dollars, wholesale cost of power, total cost, margin, and impact to customer bills in aggregate.
I am considering modeling the value of the investment as an output event, in combination with the wholesale cost as industry contribution and customer impact as an income event. My concern arises when I consider that the base case values in terms of wholesale cost and bill cost are always higher than the alternative scenarios. This methodology may be flawed. Would it be more beneficial in examining the impact solely looking at capital investment, and the change from base case for wholesale cost and customer cost?
Comments
3 comments