DougO
Comments
-
I think for your project, the most straightforward method of analysis would be "analysis-by-parts". That is, analyze the impact apple farmers with two separate activities: 1) Operational spending b...
-
In the V3 software, when you have a model open there is a search function that will allow you to answer these questions -under Help>Sector Search. I typed "fruit packing" in the search box and the...
-
Here are the underlying data for the US, which the state data reflect: Employment data for Oil and Gas Extraction is based on proprietor data from BEA REIS (lagged one year and projected to the cur...
-
Direct employment is based on output per worker. So if the price of oil and gas (output) goes down the direct employment goes up (I don't remember what happened between 2009 and 2010.) We get our n...
-
There are a number of additional possibilites (I assume you are referring to the RIMS II multipliers). 1) Are you comparing similar aggregations, as a rule of thumb, aggregation tends to increase m...
-
Wasn't referring to value added in general, but the Other property type income (a component of VA).
-
That indicates to me that the other property type income value added component for sector 439 was 0 (either originally or edited), in which case step two induced would be the same as step three.
-
Capital consumption allowance - firms reduce the profits reported to IRS by a depreciation allowance. This depreciation is added back to value added (the CCA). Value Added is equal to Gross Domesti...
-
Alternative 1 is the spending pattern of the Federal government, the spending on goods and services is the first round indirect. One of the spending items is for 439 - the payroll portion. The "dir...
-
Yes, you should be able to simply view the results of your 2010 analysis in 2011 dollars.