Avatar

ccooper

  • Total activity 31
  • Last activity
  • Member since
  • Following 0 users
  • Followed by 0 users
  • Votes 0
  • Subscriptions 6

Activity overview

Latest activity by ccooper
  • ccooper commented,

    Thank you so much. I assume the first column is showing row headers of the SAM, and the second column of this file is showing column headers of the SAM, yes?

  • ccooper commented,

    Yes, of course. Here they are. [attachment=678]h03fb783.pdf[/attachment] [attachment=679]hbcbec8a.pdf[/attachment]

  • ccooper created a post,

    Economic base analysis

    I'm reading a paper by the Alward Institute about gross versus base measures of output, employment and value-added. It looks like these can be generated from the SAM within IMPLAN models, but I'm n...

    • 2 followers
    • 5 comments
    • 0 votes
  • ccooper created a post,

    Using Disclosed ES202 data versus model employment

    We are running a multi-industry contribution analysis. In the past we have often used the most recent CEW data in our events. This time, however, we purchased the fully disclosed ES202 data for 201...

    • 1 follower
    • 1 comment
    • 0 votes
  • ccooper created a post,

    Occupation by industry matrices

    Hey there, I can't seem to locate the purchase option for the occupational matrices, so can't tell whether or not these are available for the new 2013 sectoring scheme. Any updates? Thanks!

    • 1 follower
    • 1 comment
    • 0 votes
  • ccooper commented,

    Thank you so much for your explanation. I guess this will change how we interpret the employment numbers for other sectors as well! I have another questions regarding the data. The commodity trade...

  • ccooper commented,

    Sorry! Yes, we are using 2013 annual QCEW data for Los Angeles County, compared to 2013 IMPLAN data for Los Angeles County.

  • ccooper created a post,

    IMPLAN data vs QCEW

    We typically find that the employment estimates in the IMPLAN data sets are larger than our QCEW estimates, which makes sense since IMPLAN employment includes the self-employed. However, for our cu...

    • 2 followers
    • 5 comments
    • 0 votes
  • ccooper commented,

    Thank you. I am trying this now. Will this affect the models that I have already built with 2013 data? Will I need to rebuild them?

  • ccooper created a post,

    Aggregation Scheme for 536 sectors

    Hi all, Would you have 2-digit and 3-digit NAICS aggregation schemes available for the newest 2013 data sets? Thanks, Christine

    • 2 followers
    • 3 comments
    • 0 votes