ccooper
Comments
-
OK, thanks for the suggestion.
-
Thank you so much. I assume the first column is showing row headers of the SAM, and the second column of this file is showing column headers of the SAM, yes?
-
Yes, of course. Here they are. [attachment=678]h03fb783.pdf[/attachment] [attachment=679]hbcbec8a.pdf[/attachment]
-
Thank you so much for your explanation. I guess this will change how we interpret the employment numbers for other sectors as well! I have another questions regarding the data. The commodity trade...
-
Sorry! Yes, we are using 2013 annual QCEW data for Los Angeles County, compared to 2013 IMPLAN data for Los Angeles County.
-
Great news! Will you be releasing the fully-disclosed CEW data as well?
-
Thank you so much! But now I have a couple of other questions: 1. Would an adjustment have to be made at the county level as well? It may not be important in some counties, but it might be in larg...
-
Yes, thank you so much, this does match what we have. But we are still wondering about the different tax impact between the two years. We discovered this by making an industry change in 346 of $10m...
-
We always use the trade flows method, so the multipliers are not the same (they are a bit higher than those you have sent). Can you try again using trade flows? Or is econometric modeling preferred?
-
Yes, sorry! We are looking at the state of California as a whole.