danmartin@oxfordeconomics
Comments
-
Hi. This is almost more of a curiosity question than a practical one, though it does come up practically: If I have tourism spend data that says visitors to an city spend, say $50,000,000 on air tr...
-
That's perfect, thanks!
-
OK, so the values shown in the table are net not gross, but it's the gross values that affect the analysis, right? Are the gross values presented anywhere? Thanks.
-
Thanks! I knew there was something I wasn't getting, and that's exactly the sort of thing it was sure to be.
-
Sure. I'm comparing the BEA PCEs in, for example, table 2.3.5 here: http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1 with the household spending for the 2014 national model in the online softwar...
-
Hi, just wanted to ping again on this. Are you investigating the issue? We're still eager to move forward on our work here if we can figure out what's going on here. Thanks.
-
My apologies if I'm missing something obvious, but here's what I have for Mississippi for sectors 435 and 436: [table] [tr] [td][/td] [td]435[/td] [td]436[/td] [td]Total[/td] [...
-
Thanks, this is helpful. The highest income category for households is $150k, which is lower than is ideal for me, but this is probably pretty good. Is there a way to see what the software assumes...
-
Thanks, this works out exactly. Could you comment on the difference between (the now reconciled) US household demand in the 2010 IMPLAN ($10.461 trillion) and 2010 BEA Personal Conumption Expenditu...
-
Perhaps related: when I aggregate the US model at the 3-digit NAICS level, the total household demand increases from $9.82 trillion to $9.95 trillion. Can you explain why this is?