DougO
Comments
-
One job is a fairly tiny impact, most of the employment impact in the reports may be lost in the far receding decimal places. If you need detail, I suggest running -1000 jobs and dividing the resul...
-
Still true except it is now 440 sectors (2007 and 2008 data).
-
Then you are using 2007 or 2008 data. The output estimate for 2007 Insurance agencies, brokerages and related activities comes from the BEA benchmark industry output estimates (www.bea.gov). Employ...
-
That would be a statistic with little meaning. Divide total output by total employment to get an average output per worker for the impact. I am going to assume 358 Boat building (2001-2006 data se...
-
If you are dividing direct output by direct employment, that is output per worker. It is possible that the individual firm involved is not average, but if you tell me the sector number involved, I ...
-
Only the scenario results are displayed in the default dollar year (there is a dropdown box to the left which shows the year of display). All reports in "Explore" are in the year of the database.
-
"Executive search consulting services was moved out of Human resource consulting services (60-541612) and added into Employment placement agencies (60-561310) creating Executive search services (60...
-
To combine the two files into a single odf would require time on our part. The resulting single file would cost you more than the two individual county files. To combine the two files using the so...
-
If you are talking about an output multiplier, then yes. Even if the iron is brought in from outside of the state in which the plant is located, it can still be local at the national level (I would...
-
Most analysts assume the indirect and induced effects work through the economy within a year. All relationships in the model are annual (output per worker, income per worker). A direct effect of o...