DougO
Comments
-
If you are introducing the non-payroll spending as final demands (ala analysis-by-parts) it will work. You are assuming that the labor force buys nothing locally. If you are using the default prod...
-
37 would be more appropriate here. This has more detail about the construction sectors: http://implan.com/V4/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=115&Itemid=7 If it were a true nursi...
-
You will need to deflate your total spent locally. I think I would use the GDP deflater as it is a mix of goods. You will need to calculate it externally based on the GDP index.
-
So they tell you what they spent their money on, but rather total bought from local suppliers? I think what I would do is: Step 1) as you lay out Step 2) Not necessary as they are coefficients - s...
-
See this thread: http://implan.com/V4/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=84&id=8005&Itemid=35#8006
-
When you apply and impact to the software for the spending on the private company, the software will show the employment of the private company to be direct. However, it all depends on how you want...
-
The state industry relationships are the weighted average of the counties that make up the state. If the labor income per worker for the two counties for the industry you are impacting is higher th...
-
V3 actually makes this simple. In the impact analysis event line, after you specify the "sales value" - ie, the value of the construction project the software fills in the employment, employee com...
-
Is your data showing employee compensation is 56k/employee or is that what the IMPLAN study area data is showing? If it is IMPLAN data that shows 56k/employee and your wage and salary for the new ...
-
Yes. You will note that there is no employee compensation for sector 356. The 2009 BLS CEW data show no wage and salary employment or income, so there is no employment compensation in IMPLAN. Howe...